<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Discourse &#8211; To Archeio</title>
	<atom:link href="https://toarcheio.org/publishers/discourse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://toarcheio.org</link>
	<description>To Archeio project site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:42:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Citizens as experts in a Greek political audience discussion program</title>
		<link>https://toarcheio.org/items/citizens-as-experts-in-a-greek-political-audience-discussion-program/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[apostolos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 22:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arc.local/items/citizens-as-experts-in-a-greek-political-audience-discussion-program/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This article sets out to explore the type of discourses produced by participating citizens in a Greek political audience discussion program, capitalizing on different aspects of the economic crisis that has afflicted Greece since 2010. Departing from the dichotomy between abstract, expert talk and the ordinary discourse of personal experience postulated in the 1990s, and &#8230; <a href="https://toarcheio.org/items/citizens-as-experts-in-a-greek-political-audience-discussion-program/">Continued</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article sets out to explore the type of discourses produced by participating citizens in a Greek political audience discussion program, capitalizing on different aspects of the economic crisis that has afflicted Greece since 2010. Departing from the dichotomy between abstract, expert talk and the ordinary discourse of personal experience postulated in the 1990s, and the subsequent transformations of ‘ordinariness’ in current broadcast output, this paper examines the situated performances of citizens in a concrete political broadcast format at a particular moment in time. This moment is characterized by economic crisis, as the overarching societal condition which legitimizes ordinary expertize by endowing citizens with increased conversational rights, compared to what is typical of citizen participation in political panel discussions with an audience in other European contexts, and the entitlement to engage in authoritative forms of talk. By drawing on discourse analysis and conversation analysis of sequences of TV talk, the analysis unveils the rhetorical strategies, as well as the evidential devices and forms of knowledge projected in citizen talk. Finally, the article calls attention to the implications of these forms of discursive participation for empowering the role of citizens in political communication, public dialog and democratic debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multimodal argumentation in news magazine covers: A case study of front covers putting Greece on the spot of the European economic crisis</title>
		<link>https://toarcheio.org/items/multimodal-argumentation-in-news-magazine-covers-a-case-study-of-front-covers-putting-greece-on-the-spot-of-the-european-economic-crisis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[apostolos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 22:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arc.local/items/multimodal-argumentation-in-news-magazine-covers-a-case-study-of-front-covers-putting-greece-on-the-spot-of-the-european-economic-crisis/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In this paper, front covers of news magazines are studied as a distinct multimodal genre that invites readers to buy the magazine not only by attracting their attention but also by assuming a position with respect to the particular cover story. In order to account for the argument that a front cover may convey in &#8230; <a href="https://toarcheio.org/items/multimodal-argumentation-in-news-magazine-covers-a-case-study-of-front-covers-putting-greece-on-the-spot-of-the-european-economic-crisis/">Continued</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this paper, front covers of news magazines are studied as a distinct multimodal genre that invites readers to buy the magazine not only by attracting their attention but also by assuming a position with respect to the particular cover story. In order to account for the argument that a front cover may convey in support of that position, an argumentative reconstruction is required that also needs to take seriously into account the way in which the verbal and the visual modes interact to create meaning. The study proposes a multimodal argumentation perspective on the systematic reconstruction of the arguments that front covers of news magazines put forward. As a case in point, six covers by two German weekly news magazines are analysed, featuring the role of Greece in the eurozone crisis in the period 2010–2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
