<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>multitude &#8211; To Archeio</title>
	<atom:link href="https://toarcheio.org/author_keywords/multitude/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://toarcheio.org</link>
	<description>To Archeio project site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:13:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Direct democracy now!&#8217;: The Greek indignados and the present cycle of struggles</title>
		<link>https://toarcheio.org/items/direct-democracy-now-the-greek-indignados-and-the-present-cycle-of-struggles/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[apostolos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 22:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arc.local/items/direct-democracy-now-the-greek-indignados-and-the-present-cycle-of-struggles/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This article’s ambition is to critically analyse the resistance of the Greek people to the country’s custody under the Troika that has led to a severe financial and social crisis. Emphasis is given to the ‘Outraged’ of Syntagma Square and their daily protests during the summer of 2011; a movement that has remained underreported in &#8230; <a href="https://toarcheio.org/items/direct-democracy-now-the-greek-indignados-and-the-present-cycle-of-struggles/">Continued</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article’s ambition is to critically analyse the resistance of the Greek people to the country’s custody under the Troika that has led to a severe financial and social crisis. Emphasis is given to the ‘Outraged’ of Syntagma Square and their daily protests during the summer of 2011; a movement that has remained underreported in relation to other similar phenomena, despite the huge number of participants, and the intensity of its clash with the state. In addition, besides the empirical investigation of the Greek case, the article argues that it is of particular importance to note the movement’s cultural resources, as well as the inner class and ideological divisions. Also, the study attempts to fit the case of Greece within the global capitalist crisis and the struggles that have arisen as a response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos: Our Own &#8216;Gun on The(ir) Table&#8217;</title>
		<link>https://toarcheio.org/items/chaos-our-own-gun-on-their-table/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[apostolos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 22:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arc.local/items/chaos-our-own-gun-on-their-table/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In October 2011, George Papandreou, the then Greek Prime Minister, announced he was planning to hold a referendum in order for the Greek people to decide whether to agree to the bailout plan prepared by the International Monetary Fund, the Central European Bank and the European Commission. This intention was aborted due to intense pressure &#8230; <a href="https://toarcheio.org/items/chaos-our-own-gun-on-their-table/">Continued</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In October 2011, George Papandreou, the then Greek Prime Minister, announced he was planning to hold a referendum in order for the Greek people to decide whether to agree to the bailout plan prepared by the International Monetary Fund, the Central European Bank and the European Commission. This intention was aborted due to intense pressure by Papandreou’s European partners, especially Germany and France. This interference clearly shows the problematic relationship between the so-called ‘markets’ and national-popular sovereignty. This article raises the question of why this interference happened in the first place, why the global markets felt such a big threat before the possibility of a vote taking place in a small country of 10 million inhabitants. And also, importantly, what this means in terms of potential for political agency by those who are usually considered to be lacking such agency, as having ‘no other alternative’ than to follow the one-way course of neoliberalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
